Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Case legislation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. By way of example, a ruling inside of a California appellate court would not usually be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
However, decisions rendered from the Supreme Court from the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues of your Constitution and federal regulation.
The an abundance of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made distinct that police is free to consider action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The official court record is maintained via the court of record. Copies of case file documents usually are not available within the search site and will need to get ordered from the court of record.
When there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds minor sway. Still, if there is not any precedent while in the home state, relevant case regulation from another state might be deemed via the court.
From the United States, consumers are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember a single rule of thumb when it comes to referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only to the case, but on the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
Several judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name to the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
10. Without touching the merits on the case of your issue of annual increases in the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment to become made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it proper to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the more info aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
10. Based around the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition is not deemed maintainable which is therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.